Analysis of any works, be it a book, a dissertation or just an ordinary article written by any author, allows you not only to gain new knowledge on problems of interest, but also to avoid repetition (that is, plagiarism) when creating your own works. The most difficult task for an editor is to review essays submitted to the editorial board of scientific journals by young scientists and applicants.
Instructions
Step 1
To begin with, pay attention to the relevance of the topic, based on the theoretical and practical significance of the goal, objectives, scientific novelty. Remember that one of the main requirements for an article title is its specificity. A voluminous, cumbersome title, complicates a deep study of the problem, makes it difficult to determine the exact circle of readers.
Step 2
The analysis of the truth and reliability of the given data should be based on the objectivity of the selection of material, the representativeness of the facts, and their display in the protocols of their own observations. The truth of the information obtained during the study is the basis for scientifically sound conclusions. The editor needs to find out how the author records the events; whether he evaluates them in dynamics, whether he studies in interaction with other phenomena, whether there is dogmatism and subjectivity, as well as a creative approach to the essence of the phenomenon.
Step 3
Read the main text of the article carefully, focusing on the presentation of scientific theory. At the beginning of the articles, it is customary to give several logical statements about the facts, and then, in the course of reasoning, formulate new arguments, based on the totality of the results of the author's observations and experiments. At the same time, a certain merger of the previously accumulated layer of scientific information and private inferences, proven empirically, should be traced.
Step 4
Determine whether the application is appropriate in the context of citations, as well as the optimal number of citations used by the author. Check the semantic accuracy of the cited material. Compare the information received with the list of references indicated at the end of the article. If the creation contains the results of statistical calculations, evaluate their reliability. Finally, analyze your resume text. The abstract of the article should be submitted in Russian and English. It laconically reflects the ideological line of scientific work as a whole.
